Software engineering for iGaming operations.
We build and change software for operators, gaming suppliers and technology teams: sportsbook components, trading tools, back-office systems and integrations. Work can begin with a new service or a defined part of an established platform. We map the connected systems and operating requirements so the component has a clear responsibility within the wider operation.
Operating areas
Choose an area to see the systems involved. An engagement can cover one component; it does not need to replace the whole platform.
Our experience
Our experience includes sportsbook, trading and back-office systems, feed integration, betting, settlement and responsible-gambling systems. Malta's iGaming ecosystem brings operators, suppliers and technology businesses together, with operating requirements that extend beyond a single market.
Sportsbook productsBetting, settlement and cashout components.
Betting handles offers, account checks and acceptance. Settlement applies results and product rules, including corrections. Cashout gives eligible bets an earlier settlement option, requiring calculation, current-state validation and a recorded final decision.
Markets and riskFeeds, trading intervention and exposure.
Feeds supply events, markets, prices and results. Trading tools support intervention when conditions change. Risk tooling makes exposure, limits and decision authority visible, with defined interfaces between the services.
Player and operational controlsAccount restrictions and authorised back-office work.
Responsible-gambling systems connect account limits, restrictions and interventions to product actions. Back-office tools give authorised teams the records and review controls needed to work across shifts, with access and traceability appropriate to each role.
Connected gaming productsCasino and jackpot integration boundaries.
Casino integrations connect supplier and platform services through session and transaction interfaces. Jackpot integrations add contribution, award and reconciliation responsibilities. These are broader areas we can assess; platform contracts and product rules determine the scope.
Feed integration
A feed update must reach the correct fixture, market and selection. Map provider identifiers to internal records while retaining source context. Repeated messages must not repeat an action, and delayed updates must not overwrite newer state.
Receipt time, source sequence and corrections have different meanings. Reconnects, snapshots and gaps need recovery paths, with monitoring that identifies stale data, failed mappings and unapplied updates.
Trading and risk
Trading combines feed data with operator intervention. Show the market state, why it changed and what the user may do. Agree an override's scope, reason and expiry, including how it survives subsequent automated updates.
Exposure displays need understood calculations and freshness. Distinguish confirmed records from pending work, and show refresh failures within a recoverable trading workflow.
Availability for new requests
- Open
- Requests follow the available terms and account checks.
- Suspended
- New acceptance is blocked; accepted bets retain their terms.
- Reopened
- New terms apply to subsequent requests; the intervention remains recorded.
Illustrative example. Sample records. Product policy determines actual behavior.
Bet acceptance
Check market availability, price, account permissions and restrictions before recording an outcome. If accepted, retain the terms with the bet. Later price or market changes must not erase that acceptance.
A timeout leaves an unresolved request, not an assumed decision. Distinguish retries from new bets, and test concurrent requests and account-control propagation at the relevant service boundaries. The operator's jurisdiction and policy determine the detailed checks.
- Market availability
- Current price
- Account permissions
- Applicable restrictions
An unresolved timeout needs outcome resolution. It is not an acceptance or rejection.
Cashout
A displayed cashout offer is a calculation at a point in time, not a reserved price. Completion requires fresh validation against the bet, product rules and current event or market state. Keep offer, request and recorded completion distinct.
Define provider and operator responsibilities for calculation, validation and account action. Unavailable offers, rejected requests and retries need clear outcomes, with the accepted bet and account records kept consistent for reconciliation.
Settlement corrections
A revised result, abandoned event or voided selection can affect a settled bet. Retain the original settlement and applied rule when calculating or proposing an adjustment. Policy determines whether it proceeds automatically or requires authorised review.
Source results, rule versions, processing attempts and interventions provide the investigation trail. The example shows one review policy, retaining all four decisions together.
Example correction history
Illustrative example. Sample records.
Accepted bet
BET–0142- Market
- Match winner
- Selection
- Home team
- Accepted terms
- Retained with the bet
- Original result
- Home win
- Original settlement
- Won
Original record retained
Original settlement
The accepted bet settles as Won. Its original terms and settlement remain recorded.
Home win · WonCorrected result
An away win replaces the result. BET–0142 is identified for review without overwriting its settlement.
Away win · review requiredProposed adjustment and review
Under this example policy, an authorised reviewer compares Won with the proposed Lost outcome.
Won → Lost · awaiting reviewerRecorded example adjustment
The authorised adjustment is recorded alongside the original settlement and corrected result.
Original + correction + review history
Account reconciliation is separate. Related account entries still require adjustment and reconciliation after the settlement decision is recorded.
Illustrative review policy. Product rules, jurisdiction and operating requirements determine actual behaviour.
Back-office workflows
Give failed mappings, unresolved requests and settlement discrepancies a responsible role, investigation context and permitted next action. Viewing, requesting a correction and approving it require different authority; support users need context without unnecessary financial or trading access.
Disclose sensitive information according to the task and record access or changes where required. Trading, finance and support need consistent bet definitions, date ranges and reporting cut-offs so comparisons reveal discrepancies.
Account controls
Map ownership, propagation and confirmation across back office, cached views and bet processing so account restrictions reach the services that enforce them. This translates the operator's requirements into testable software behavior; it does not establish regulatory certification.
Test delayed messages, unavailable dependencies, stale sessions and repeated requests at service boundaries. Agree failure responses with the responsible team, retaining evidence of the requested change, effective state and affected actions.
Controlled delivery
Map the component's contracts, records and dependencies, then compare old and new behavior using historical cases and representative data. Plan monitoring and a controlled cutover; where implementations coexist, only one has authority for consequential writes, and shadow outputs remain separate.
Handover includes transition tests, interface documentation and operating visibility so the team can release and investigate the component within the wider sportsbook.